Page 138 - Hospital Authority Convention 2018
P. 138

Service Enhancement Presentations
      HOSPITAL AUTHORITY CONVENTION 2018


             F4.4      Clinical Safety and Quality Services II                          16:15  Room 421

            Are We Imaging Gently Enough? A Clinical Audit on Paediatric Digital Chest Radiograph Dosages
                    1
                                      2
                             2
                                             2
            Fung KFK , Chan TYE , Yeung TW , Lau HY , Wong YC  2
            1                                                          2
             Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Kwong Wah Hospital,  Department of Radiology, Tuen Mun Hospital,
            Hong Kong
            Introduction
            Radiation protection is an important issue in paediatric radiology, as children are more susceptible to deleterious radiation-
            induced effect than adult. Digital chest radiography, despite its relatively low radiation dose, is one of the most frequent
            examinations performed in the paediatric patients. Image enhancement through post processing may mask improper
            collimation or exposure factors. It is therefore important to ensure radiation dose delivered to our paediatric patients is as low
            as reasonably achievable through clinical audit.

            Objectives
            To audit the dosage of digital chest radiography performed in paediatric patients in Tuen Mun Hospital.

            Methodology
      Monday, 7 May 2018  as no local DRL is available. All patients from age 0 to 15 years with CXR taken at main department of TMH were included in
            Phase one audit was performed prospectively from January to March 2017, collecting dose-area products (DAPs) and
            identifying potential factors leading to excessive radiation dosages. Phase two audit followed in July to September 2017 after
            changes have been implemented. European diagnostic reference level (EDRL) for paediatric imaging was used as standard

            this audit. The patients were assigned to nominal age group 0, 1, 5, 10 and 15 years. Portable CXR, CXR taken for line/tube
            placement and whole body radiograph were excluded. Image quality was assessed using European Guidelines on Quality
            Criteria for Diagnostic Radiographic Images in Paediatrics by two independent paediatric radiologists. Rejection analysis was
            also performed.
            Results
            63 and 93 radiographs were assessed in phase one and two audits respectively. Excessive radiation dosages were identified
            in  age  groups  0  and  1  in  phase  one  audit.  Key  contributors to  high  radiation  dose  include  high  rate  of  anti-scatter  grid
            use, inadequate collimation, and frequent automatic exposure control use in small patients. Standardised paediatric CXR
            protocol addressing these issues was established after phase one audit. In phase two audit, median doses in all age groups
            were below EDRL. There was also good adherence to the newly established protocol. All CXRs in phase two audit show
            acceptable diagnostic quality. Rejection rate was 6.3% in phase one and 5.4% in phase two audit.











































   136
   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143